
In June, a federal judge said that attorneys would have to provide more evidence to show that alleged discrimination could be traced to segregation in order for the litigation to proceed. In his ruling the judge wrote that “the complaint alleges differences between FAMU and other public universities, including in funding, quality of faculty, graduation rates, and mission statements, but the complaint is short on facts tying these differences to the segregated-by-law system.” He gave attorneys time to refile the lawsuit with more evidence to prove racial discrimination.
Recently, a revised lawsuit was filed. The plaintiffs argue that “part and parcel of eliminating unnecessary program duplication is to create unique and/or high demand programs at FAMU, thus giving it the ability to have its own distinctive academic identity. A program is only ‘unique’ to FAMU if it is not offered at Florida State, the only traditionally White institution that is geographically proximate to FAMU. Once a ‘unique’ program is duplicated, it is no longer unique. A ‘high demand’ program is one that a disproportionately large number of students are likely to choose as their major program(s) of study.”

